Hey, hey, "go to the basics list with those typos"----:)))
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
Excuse me...... I meant to say "IPX does NOT have to use SPX for
transport..."
Sorry for the "non-type"
Mike W.
"Michael L. Williams" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> It seems interested to note that no one has mentioned that IPX not only
> performs addressing and path determination (layer 3) but can also act as
> it's own conectionless transport too (layer 4) like UDP...... IPX does
HAVE
> to use SPX for transport..... so IPX is really a Layer3 & 4 protocol
>
> Mike W.
>
> "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > At 12:11 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote:
> >
> > >Thank you veery much for clarifying that.
> > >
> > >Pardon my ignorance on Novell stuff, but does this mean, then, that the
> > >ODI "wrap" and IPX "share" the layer 2 functions?
> >
> > No. IPX does layer-3 functions.
> >
> > ODI is just an Ethernet driver. It allows a NIC to be used to carry data
> > for different protocols. For example, ODI allows a computer with a
single
> > NIC to be simultaneously connected to both an IPX and an IP network. So,
> > IPX interfaces to ODI. It's a layered architecture.
> >
> > >Also, what is the NWLINK equivalent of ARP?
> >
> > NWLINK is NetBIOS running on top of IPX/SPX. It's just generic IPX. It
has
> > nothing to do with ARP which is an IP function to map IP addresses to
MAC
> > addresses.
> >
> > These basic questions belong on the CCNA study list, not this one. Also,
> > find yourself a good protocol chart. Every so often someone sends around
a
> > link to one.
> >
> > Priscilla
> >
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:51 AM
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
> > >
> > >IPX runs at layer 3. There's no question of that.
> > >
> > >Perhaps the confusing thing is that IPX layer-3 addresses consist of
> > >network.MAC. The node part of the address is the same as the layer-2
NIC
> > >address, also known as MAC or hardware address.
> > >
> > >This means that IPX doesn't need an ARP. If you know the Layer-3
address,
> > >you know the Layer-2 address also.
> > >
> > >Above IPX, the most common Novell protocol is NetWare Core Protocol
(NCP)
> > >used by file servers. Print servers use SPX. It's a myth that NCP uses
> SPX.
> > >It doesn't.
> > >
> > >Priscilla
> > >
> > >At 12:57 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote:
> > > >I thought IPX was layer 2 in the IPX/SPX stack.
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Charles Manafa
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > >Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:25 AM
> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >IPX is layer 3
> > > >Switches operate at layer 2
> > > >
> > > >CM
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong)
> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Sent: 20/06/01 08:14
> > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
> > > >
> > > >Thanks! I found the setting in the printer to disable the IPX.
> However
> > > >Can
> > > >we filter the IPX traffic on our 2900 IOS switches, and set based
5500
> > > >switches. IF yes.. what is the command to disable transmission of
IPX
> > > >traffic in the switches.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Jim Dixon
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:40 PM
> > > >To: Sim, CT (Chee Tong)
> > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >It may be an HP JetDirect card.
> > > >
> > > >Get rid of it by assigning your JetDirect and or Printer an IP
Address
> > > >(whichever you need to do)
> > > >Turn IPX off on the JetDirect Print Server.
> > > >
> > > >OR
> > > >
> > > >Filter IPX at your router and see if you can still print.
> > > >Then
> > > >RE_check for your IPX.. Is it still there? Did printer stop working?
> > > >If so
> > > >then you may want to keep IPX till you can switch to IP.
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong)
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:12 AM
> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Subject: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Hi.
> > > >
> > > >I use the fluke meter and ethereal software to check the health of
our
> > > >network and I found there are a lot of IPX traffic in our network.
But
> > > >we
> > > >have no Novell server here and where is the IPX traffic coming from?
> > > >
> > > >In the ethereal output I saw a lot of statement like
> > > >source destination Protocol Info
> > > >0.0008c7280106 0.ffffffffffff IPX SAP Nearest Query
> > > >0.0008c7280106 0.ffffffffffff IPX SAP General Query
> > > >0.0008c7280106 0.ffffffffffff IPX SAP General Response
> > > >0.0008c7280106 0.ffffffffffff NBIPX Find name "our
> > > >domain
> > > >name"
> > > >0.0008c7280106 0.ffffffffffff BROWSER Host Announcement
> > > >"workstation name" workstation, server, print queue server, NT
> > > >workstation,
> > > >NT server, Potential browser.
> > > >
> > > >In fluke meter, I saw these IPX are mostly by printer and printer
> > > >server?
> > > >Why printer got something to do with IPX .
> > > >
> > > >How to get rid of this?
> > > >
> > > >Please advice
> > > >Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: jason douglas
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:38 PM
> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Subject: Re: what about ccie-pre-qualification test in boson cisco
[7:
> > > >9041]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >I thought it was similar.
> > > >
> > > >frank wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > compared with 350-001,easier or much the same?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > frank
> > > >--
> > > >Jason Douglas
> > > >Lucent World Wide Services
> > > >Pager 888-451-0755
> > > >==================================================================
> > > >De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en
> > > >is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht
> > > >onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en
> > > >de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren.
> > > >==================================================================
> > > >The information contained in this message may be confidential
> > > >and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you
> > > >receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents
> > > >herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >==================================================================
> > > >==================================================================
> > > >De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en
> > > >is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht
> > > >onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en
> > > >de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren.
> > > >==================================================================
> > > >The information contained in this message may be confidential
> > > >and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you
> > > >receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents
> > > >herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >==================================================================
> > >________________________
> > >
> > >Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > >http://www.priscilla.com
> > ________________________
> >
> > Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > http://www.priscilla.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9870&t=9045
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
