Dear Group,
We are experimenting with a circuit that involves 2 ISPs using ATM and
RFC1483
bridging.
A quick circuit is:
RouterA ------ LS1010 --------- Fore ---------- LabLS1010 --------- RouterB
Both RouterA and RouterB have BVIs.
On RouterA, although everything is configured for the BVI, if you give the
command:
sh bridge - no mac address is displayed for the BVI and it is not forwarding.
If you do a sh int bvi1, you see the mac address assigned and the BVI reports
being UP.
There are other BVIs on RouterA which display the proper info sh "sh bridge"
On RouterA we see Aal CRC errors and Oversize SDUs.
At one time during the test, the mtu size on both BVIs didn't match. We
fixed
that and then the problem switched ends. RouterB now didn't report the
bridge
where it did before and now RouterA has a bridge.
Almost like a simplex circuit, sometimes.
Would just like to know if anyone recognizes this type of behaviour before I
get into a longer description.
tia
Kevin Wigle
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10165&t=10165
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
