Doohickeys???? Please explain!
Karl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bradley J. Wilson"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
> Oh cripe, *please* let's not go through the whole "Are doohickeys at L2 or
> L3" debate again!!
>
> ;-)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chuck Larrieu
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 5:47 PM
> Subject: RE: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
>
>
>
> Is that a layer 2 or 3?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:48 PM
> To: Jack Nalbandian; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
>
>
>
> it's kinda like a "doohickey" but not nearly as high end as a
> "thingamajiggy"
>
> HTH
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jack Nalbandian
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
>
>
>
> Wait, what device is the "thingie/podmaker"?
>
> Priscilla wrote:
>
> I just finished writing some information on pods in the protocol
> analysis
> world. In that case, a pod is an extra little thingie (technical
> term) that
> helps the analyzer get on the network. With full-duplex links,
for
> example,
> if you don't want to break the link and put in a shared hub for
> attaching
> the analyzer, you can get a so-called pod that leaves the link
at
> full-duplex traffic and buffers traffic before sending it to the
> analyzer.
> These pods are costly.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10187&t=10128
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
