>
I think there is a little piece of genious in this statement :o)
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Larrieu"
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 2:54 AM
Subject: OFF TOPIC RANT - Who Cares? WAS: MPLS [7:220]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Howard C. Berkowitz
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 5:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: MPLS [7:220]
>
>
> >Does anyone have a simple MPLS configuration they could post?
>
> >To solve what problem with MPLS?
>
> Oh give it up, Howard. Nobody cares. All they want is The Answer.
>
> I've been kicking around the CCIE list for several months now. People who
> want to be CCIE's but don't read the RFC's. Or Comer. Or Stevens. Or
> Berkowitz. Or Oppenheimer. Or anything else. Doyle, Halabi, and Caslow -
> that's what gets you to the CCIE level! And why should they do otherwise?
I
> don't recall seeing anything on my lab that made me wish I'd spend more
time
> studying RFC's. Or TCP/IP theory. In fact just about everything I saw on
my
> lab made me wish I'd spent less time with the RFC's and more time doing
> other things.
>
> How does routing work? How does redistribution work? How does OSPF work?
Who
> cares? Just give me the configs that will help me pass. If I memorize
enough
> variations, I'm ready for anything the lab throws my way.
>
> OK. Out of my system. Back to memorizing configs ;->
>
> Chuck
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10511&t=220
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
