I have to agree with the subnetting thing. IP addresses are onlywri
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 6/29/2001 at 8:24 PM Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>>Open Forum might be more up to speed if your free-time consists of working
>>address plans in binary or looking for probability in the pregnant chads of
>>Fortran punch cards :o)
>
>There's something wrong with doing address plans in binary? Best way
>to learn, once you realize you don't have to do all 32 bits in
>binary. Seriously, when I plan an address structure, and I am
>documenting it, my primary mode is binary, and then converting to
>dotted decimal where appropriate. Now, when I say planning address
>structures, it often is to say "a /19 here, split into 8 /21 for
>areas".
>
>Not boasting here, but when you've been doing these for what...15
>years or so, I can do a fair bit of subnetting in my head. There are
>tricks, but I wouldn't confuse a beginner with them.
>
>I do miss punch cards, though. Blank punch cards were really great
>for shopping lists.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10538&t=10427
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
