I think CID is at 3.0 now. It has been for years. But Cisco beta-tested 4.0 
recently. Maybe it is live now. I don't think it has case studies, but I 
could be wrong.

I think your bro is confused. Maybe case study (scenario) means something 
different to him? There are some questions that pose design requirements or 
situations, but just in a sentence or two. There weren't any long exhibits. 
I took it a while ago though.

Priscilla

At 06:05 PM 7/3/01, Michael L. Williams wrote:
>Uh.....  that wasn't my brother that passed in 10 seconds =)
>
>I just can't imagine why he would recall sooooooo many questions from case
>studies if there were none......
>
>When were the exams changed?   Lemme know =)  I got CID a week from
>Friday....
>
>Mike W.
>
>"Priscilla Oppenheimer"  wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Is that the same brother-in-law who passed in 3 minutes? ;-)
> >
> > Seriously, CID doesn't have scenarios. Unless maybe there's a new version
> > out?
> >
> > Priscilla
> >
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 12:35 PM
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: Passed CCDA [7:10784]
> > >
> > >
> > >My brother-in-law recently took the CID and said about 1/2 of his 100
> > >questions were based on case-studies (scenarios).......
> > >You musta just got the easy version =)
> > >
> > >Mike W.
> > >
> > >"Harrison, Michael"  wrote in message
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > No scenarios on the CID test.  100 questions multiple choice.  There
>is
> > >not
> > > > even multiple checkboxes "choose all that apply".  It is a very
> > > > straightforward test but do not underestimate it.  If you are
prepared
>it
> > >is
> > > > a VERY fast test.  If you are not I can imagine it will be a very
long
>2
> > > > hours.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 5:26 AM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Passed CCDA [7:10784]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > Just want to thank all of you for there feed backs.
> > > >
> > > > Passed CCDA today.  72 question, 755 to pass, scored something over
>850.
> > > > The exam itself is not too hard, but the way Cisco presents the
>scenario
> > > > questions is very
> > > > strange. About 4 scenarios are spread among the 72 questions. What I
>mean
> > >is
> > > > you got 1 question on case 1, the next question on case 4, then some
> > > > non-scenario questions and so on.
> > > >
> > > > I only used Cisco's CCDA Study Guide. I missed some questions that
>were
> > >not
> > > > mentioned in the book but found them in the CID one.
> > > >
> > > > Are there any scenarios in the CID one!!!
> > > >
> > > > Tarry
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
> > > > http://www.gmx.net
> > > >
> > > > GMX Tipp:
> > > >
> > > > Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1!
> > > > http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a
> > > > Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and
> > > > affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in
>this
> > > > e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not
>reflect
> > >the
> > > > views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
> > >Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and
> > >affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this
> > >e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect
>the
> > >views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
> > ________________________
> >
> > Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > http://www.priscilla.com
________________________

Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10917&t=10784
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to