I would just take them off i.e remove the access-group
statements for both just to eliminate any restrictive
movement.
Phil.
--- Uche Ishionwu wrote: >
Ok,I'll try it without the access lists...but I
> guess access list '99' has
> to remain 'cause it's tied to Dialer list 2. Right
> ???
> cheers.
> -Uche.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11683&t=11653
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
