Are you missing the point that the lab with still be very tough? The only issue is meeting the customer demand for rack time for testing. Cisco cannot do this in a two day format and much of the two day stuff was overhead. I personally think one day will be tougher. Pete *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 7/19/2001 at 1:25 PM Ciaron Gogarty wrote: >I do believe that the format IS changing to a one day lab, so it's >actually >taking the piss out of the reasons Cisco are giving for changing the >format... > >Personally, I think CCIE is THE most respected vendor certification out >there, so why change what (to my mind) has been a great format for >seperating the weed from the chaff?? In the end, the market will get >swamped with half baked CCIE's who have no substantive real world >experience >and the value of the cert will go down... much like the way the MCSE went.. > >thats my two cents > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 19 July 2001 14:52 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: New CCIE Lab!!??!!! [7:12926] - IGNORE THIS - JOKE >[7:12943] > > >thanks.... > >I read this after an all night work session - half asleep > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Ciaron Gogarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 19 July 2001 15:23 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: New CCIE Lab!!??!!! [7:12926] > > >I think u should read the article more closely > >;-) > >-----Original Message----- >From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 19 July 2001 10:05 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: FW: New CCIE Lab!!??!!! [7:12926] > > >This is what I received from a colleague. > >Is this true????? >http://angelfire.com/my/no1daylab/new_format.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12980&t=12980 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
