Thanks for the config sample, and thank you all for the input.
I'm drawn to 802.1Q, although I can't really give exact reasons.
During the transition I will have a few 1900 and a couple of 2800
switches in the network and it seems I'll have less trouble with the
802.1Q.
On 23 Jul 2001 15:39:43 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Ed Horley") wrote:
>The switches you have support both ISL and Dot1Q if you are running the
>enterprise code, not sure for the standard stuff. For a sample config:
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html
>
>Hope that helps.
>
>
>""Arun"" wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Hi
>> ISL is cisco stuff ......if ur network is all cisco you can use ISL in
>that
>> but if it involves other switches or in near future u see this thing use
>> Dot.1Q.This is for the equipment ..and for the performance thing which one
>> is better i thing somebody more experienced can help u on this .
>>
>> regards
>> Arun Sharma
>> ""Sammi"" wrote in message
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> > I'm not clear on which standard I should use for VLAN setup.
>> > I will be using a 2948G-L3 as a core switch. Connected to the core
>> > will be a number of 2948xl as access switches. The majority of these
>> > access ports will connect directly to end stations, though some will
>> > connect to other 2948s (via fiber and via wireless) which then will
>> > connect to end stations.
>> >
>> > Does this last fact mean I must use ISL so as to implement trunking?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13446&t=13325
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
