ha... Maybe I'll retract the previous post. I just realized what was going
on.
Dude, if it works, why change it? Or why spend money otherwise?
If you want the cheapest route imaginable, go with an old 486 and throw
linux on it! :)
-Patrick
>>> "Hire, Ejay" 07/30/01 06:23PM >>>
The cheap way to do this is with a $99.00 LinkSys router/firewall.
-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 5:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Probobly a stupid question.... [7:14273]
Is it possible to set up NAT on a router for DSL, allowing the DSL side
connection to receive a DHCP generated address??
I have been running 2000 server Nat, and using my DSL connection with no
problems, but would like to remove the server interface completely...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14281&t=14273
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
