port 179, as someone else said. but if you are doing this through a
firewall, you will also need a static NAT. you will also need an eBGP
multihop configured for your eBGP neighbor, as will that neighbor to reach
you ( eBGP assumes the neighbors are on the same segment )
I've actually never tried this, believing this is a silly design, but
intellectually speaking, there is no reason it should not work that I can
see, if the above advice is followed.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Circusnuts
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BGP, TCP, & Firewalls [7:14286]
I'm surveying a project I have been slated for @ work & I was wondering if
the
BGP guru's could help clear-up a question. If I were to run internal BGP &
external BGP, am I forced to leave a TCP port open in the firewall ???
I had not an answer when the customer asked me this :-P
Thanks
Phil
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14300&t=14286
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
