[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I agree with you, Howard. All the best practices I have ever
> learned have
> stated that route summarization should be avoided, and, if not
> possible, at
> least minimized. I think unless you have a large network with
> multiple AS's,
> route summarization should only be considered a temporary fix
> until a common
> protocol is chosen and can be implemented. I consider it to be
> along the
> lines of using Virtual Links.
> My .02c,
> Rob H. CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
Where did you learn that summarization was to be kept to a minimum and was a
temporary fix? That's crazy....... Summarization is a GOOD thing.....
Virtual Links are for temporary use, but summarization is one of the MAIN
advantages of using hierachical addressing!! Geez..... I read your comment
to many friends of mine including plenty of CCNP/CCDP/CCIEs and every one of
them said "this guy's crazy". I'm *not* saying you're crazy, but I would
sincerely like to know where you read/learned that summarization "should be
avoided" and "is a temporary fix"..... Please tell me your sources.
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14808&t=14783
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
