You could also, I suppose, make use of Multilink Multichassis PPP. But that
is almost certainly overkill.
""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> yes.
>
> well, let me qualify that by saying you could terminate on four routers,
and
> then have those four connect to a single router further upstream, which
> would per packet load share to each of those four routers. or on two
> routers, and so on.
>
> eventually, there has to be one source router that shows four equal cost
> routes, and load shares accordingly.
>
> HTH
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Santosh Koshy
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 7:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Load Balancing... [7:14865]
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a slight dilemma to which I cannot seem to find a definitive
> answer.. We have 4 circuits going from Canada to the US...
>
> Is it necessary to terminate all the circuits into one router to do
> "per-packet" load balancing.
>
> --
> Santosh Koshy
> WAN Administrator
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14881&t=14865
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
