A quick thought here.
You are correct in saying that the network statement is a trigger used to
inject routes into the BGP process. However, it really has nothing to do
with IBGP specifically nor does it in any way allow intra AS routing to
occur. Routing within the AS will always be the domain of the IGP. I'm not
sure if this was the point you were making or not.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 8/5/2001 at 10:33 PM Andrew Fernandez wrote:
>The NETWORK command in the Router BGP configuration mode is to inject
>local
>internal routes learned via an (IGP) Interior Gateway Protocal Routing
>protocal i.e. OSPF,EIGRP... into its BGP routing table. Because IBGP
>connections do not need to be directly connected and needs an IGP to get to
>its IBGP neighbor.
>
>So in this case the network command is used by IBGP to get around it's own
>autonomous network.
>
>Your EBGP route is learned staticly via the NEIGHBOR x.x.x.x REMOTE-AS
>(number)command. Remember EBGP neighbors MUST share a same subnet i.e.
>directly connected. So all EBGP routes will be pointing to the remote-as
>directly connected router as its learned default gateway.
>
>Hope this helps.
>
>Andrew
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15022&t=14954
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
