Thanks Phil,
That actually helped, because it is confirming that I am on the right track,
so I know I haven't gone (too) crazy yet.
Take care,
Ole
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ole Drews Jensen
Systems Network Manager
CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
RWR Enterprises, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.RouterChief.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NEED A JOB ???
http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----Original Message-----
From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Redistribute OSPF -> EIGRP with distribute-list [7:15031]
Your method sounds correct. I would lean toward the culprit being in the
IOS. We use EIGRP exclusively on one contract I'm working & I do from time
to time find EIGRP to EIGRP compatibility issues (along with memory leaks).
If you are not exercising Voice ("T" stuff), I have found 11.2(18),
11.3(11a), 11.3(22a), & 12.0(8) very stable GR's when dealing with EIGRP.
Not sure I have helped...
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ole Drews Jensen"
To:
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:14 PM
Subject: Redistribute OSPF -> EIGRP with distribute-list [7:15031]
> Hello,
>
> I was following some examples in my BSCN study guide, but it didn't do as
it
> should (I think).
>
> With three routers, A & B in an EIGRP AS and A & C in an OSPF AS.
>
> Router C has two loopback interfaces.
>
> [RouterB]---eigrp---[RouterA]---ospf---[RouterC]=Two Loopback Interfaces
>
> I did a redistribute on Router A from OSPF to EIGRP, and I could now see
> Router C's two loopback networks on Router B as "D EX".
>
> So far so good.
>
> Now, I did a distribute-list on Router A to deny one of the loopback
> networks to be distributed to the EIGRP AS.
>
> And I waited, and I waited, and I waited, but the two networks kept being
> shown on Router B.
>
> The default hold-down time should be 15 seconds, since the connection was
64
> kbps, but still after 10 minutes, both network showed up.
>
> After I on Router A removed the redistribution and added it again, it
> finally only showed the one (permitted) loopback network address in my
> routing table on Router B.
>
> This weird problem occured again when removing the distribute-list. The
> routing table on Router B did not show the other loopback network from
> Router C until I had removed redistribution and added it again on Router
A.
>
> Is this normal, or could it be an error in my IOS (an old 11.x)???
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Ole
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Ole Drews Jensen
> Systems Network Manager
> CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
> RWR Enterprises, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> http://www.RouterChief.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> NEED A JOB ???
> http://www.oledrews.com/job
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15050&t=15031
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
