OK, it seems that my 6509 is running an a hybrid mode. It has 2 supervisor
engine cards running CATOS and 2 MSFC cards running IOS. Also, There are
multiple groups (one group per VLAN). All group use the first MSFC card for
routing ( this is based on the "show standby" on the first card IOS that
said all the card is active for all VLANs). I also have EIGRP and NAT
running on the first MSFC card (and of course on the second card with same
configuration).
Problem:
- Though the second MSFC card indicated that it is the standby router for
all VLANs (verified with "show standby" ), it actually still DOES the
routing and load balancing between the VLANs.
- Since the second MSFC is also configured for NAT with the exactly NAT
translation as the first MSFC, it actually NAT some of the IP addresses.
Question:
- Is there any way to keep the EIGRP still on both MSFC IOS and keep the
second MSFC stay standby still (no routing, no load balancing, no natting
and nothing else), listen and only kick off if the first MFSC died?
Thanks All for the help and suggestion!!!
Thomas
""Thomas N."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All,
>
> I have a problem here with HSRP on 6509. The Cisco 6509 has 2 MSFC cards.
> As I understand correctly, only the first card (active one) does the
> routing. The second card (standby one) should do NOTHING, unless the
first
> card goes down (please correct me if I am wrong). In my case, things are
> different. It seems both cards do the routing. When I do a trace on a
> destination, the result flips flop between the actually IP addresses of
the
> vlan on both cards. Let's say I have VLAN 100 with:
>
> Virtual IP address = 10.100.1.100 255.255.0.0
> IP address on first card (active) = 10.100.1.1 255.255.0.0
> IP address on second card (standbly) = 10.100.1.2 255.255.0.0
>
> When I do the trace on a destination that pass through this 6509, some
path
> includes 10.100.1.1, while other includes 10.100.1.2
>
> Is there some way I can check if the HSRP is configured correctly on my
> 6509? Thanks in advance!
>
> Thomas
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15581&t=15570
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]