Cisco is working on the bug for only the per-packet option. This has been
seen on the 6-port CT3 cards only. The default, per-destination works
as it should...i.e. load balance. And it works fine......Just make sure
that the queueing option is set to FIFO, no ip route-cache, no ip
mroute-cache, no ip route-cache distributed..... on the serials. And
route 4 defaults out via the outbound serial intfs.....Hope this helps!
Regards, :-)
>From: "Chuck Larrieu" >Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" >To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
>Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 16:56:41 -0400 > >I've seen comments along those
lines over on the NANOG group, if that means >anything ;-> > >Chuck >
>-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Schneider, Matt >Sent:
Monday, August 13, 2001 11:43 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE:
load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] > > >are you saying that CEF is
buggy? > >-----Original Message----- >From: Scott M. Trieste
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:11 PM >To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] >
> >If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they
won't use >a technology that has proved buggy: CEF. My recommendation
would be to use >the load balancing feature of such IGP routing protocols
like OSPF or EIGRP. > >""khramov"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I am getting 4 T1s but
I think I will have only one IP address. How can > > I load balance 1IP
misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16128&t=15692
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
