a). yes
b). the route statement on the switch should point out the interface on the
switch (connected to the hub), this statement has nothing to do with the hub
interface (or sub-interfaces).
""Ray Smith"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Guys,
>
> Correct me if I am wrong but in a Frame-Relay lab scenaio that I am doing.
> I have 3 routers representing spokes, 1 4000 series configured as a
switch,
> and 1 representing the Hub/HQ router. I am planning on using
sub-interfaces
> on the HUB and physical interfaces for the spoke routers.
>
> My question are:-
>
> a). Don't I only need 1 physical cable from router HUB to the Switch?
>
> b). In the frame-relay route statement on the switch, would I map the
> routes to the sub-interfaces as opposed to the single physical interface
> (S0) on the Hub router?
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16222&t=16221
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
