I don't believe your talking that much of a savings (between the 2900 &
3500). The 3500 wills scale to Gig uplink , plus the 2900's EOL's in
October. The 3500's will also enforce QOS, although this in not a concern
in my application of the switch.
Thanks for the .02 though !!!
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Duchin"
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: VLAN Security [7:18203]
> Why a 3500? You could go with a lower end switch if you only need it for
> that and save some money. A 2900 would do the job... you can span to
> multiple ports as well.
>
> Jeff
>
> ""Circusnuts"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I'm finishing a project @ work & have an opportunity to recommend
multiple
> > 3500 series switches or VLAN configuration. The placement of these
boxes
> > will
> > be before a firewall, coming off of a BGP router (for IDS's,
SwitchProbes,
> > DMZ, etc.,). Can anyone think of an argument either way ???
> >
> > Thanks Everyone
> > Phil
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18210&t=18203
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
