I don't think this is correct. Bellow is a real working config example where there are more than one interface-dlci command on a single p2multipoint interface: interface Serial1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no keepalive ! interface Serial1.1 multipoint ip address 172.31.0.2 255.255.0.0 ip ospf network point-to-multipoint frame-relay interface-dlci 101 frame-relay interface-dlci 111 frame-relay interface-dlci 121 frame-relay interface-dlci 131 ! Frame-relay map ip statements should only be required if you don't want (or can't) use frame-relay inverse-arp.. Regards, ER ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lance" To: Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:55 PM Subject: Re: OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcast [7:19001] If you are using p2multipoint mode then the router should not let you enter the frame-relay interface-dlci command, only the frame-relay map ip command would be allowed. Lance ""Roger Sohn"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm running OSPF over Frame-Relay in a hub and spoke > configuration.(CCbootcamp labs) I've set up Router1(hub) to have interface > S0.1 (p2p) and interface S0.2(multipoint). For multipoint connections, it's > pretty easy because I just input map ip statements. > > But for my p2p connection, I'm having trouble understanding when I'm > supposed to use the "frame-relay interface-dlci" , "frame-relay map ip", or > frame-relay map ip broadcast" statements on the hub and spokes. Can anyone > help shed some light on this? > > I've tried using a combination of all 3 types on both the hub and spoke, and > every time the hub and spoke are able to ping each other without any > problems. > > -Roger Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19021&t=19021 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
