Cisco wrong? Perish the thought!!! ;->
seeing as 134 is 10000110, and is in no way relevant here, I would suggest
that the lazy no good subcontractor that Cisco hired to write / proof / tech
review / whatever is wrong.
welcome to the world of study materials.
best wishes
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
The New Guy
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 9:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: route summarisation question [7:19970]
A buddy and I are currently preparing for the BSCN exam.
One of the review questions involving route summarization is as follows:
172.21.136.0/24 and 172.21.143.0/24 can be summarized as: ??
We both came to the same conclusion:
^
172.21.136.0 -> 10101100.00010101.10001000.00000000
172.21.143.0 -> 10101100.00010101.10001111.00000000
^
Both addresses have the first 20 bits in common so the summarized address
would
be:
172.21.136.0/21
However, Cisco says the answer is 172.21.134.0/21
Can someone please confirm we summarized this route right. I think the test
from Cisco is wrong, typo or something
Dyland
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19980&t=19970
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
