Ok Agreed.
But what if the routers finds 2 matchings for one IP address while
performing an ARP broadcast?
Hamid
*****************************************
""Peter Van Oene"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Keep in mind that one routes between IP subnets, not VLANs. VLANs are a
> layer two concept. From there you should be able to answer you own first
> question. In the second case, given IP subnets have unique ranges, only
on
> PC will be on the valid subnet and hence be able to communicate to the
rest
> of the network. Neither PC will be disabled as far as I know, but only
one
> will function. Using DHCP is highly recommended to overcome this manual
> configuration errors, not to mention it scales better.
>
> Pete
>
>
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
> On 8/18/2001 at 3:55 AM Hamid wrote:
>
> >Hi
> >
> >I was studying the InterVlan routing documents and I got to some
questions.
> >In a scenario like the attached file:
> >
> >1. How does the external Router decide how to route the packets between
the
> >VLANs, is the INTERVLAN routing based on the IP address assigned to
> >sub-inteface?
> >
> >2. In these scenarios, how does the router detect a conflicting IP
address?
> >For example, if each IP subnet is assigned to a VLAN( 10.10.1.0 to VLAN 1
> >and 10.10.2.0 to VLAN 2), if two computers on both VLANs are assigned the
> >same IP address (for example 10.10.1.5), how is the confilit detected and
> >which computer is disabled?
> >
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Hamid
> >
> >
> >[demime removed a uuencoded section named 50a.jpg which was 1310 lines]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20125&t=16445
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
