reminds me a bit of the long running discussions about the naming of
servers.
the tradeoff is having fun names versus functional names, and having no
pneumonic that is self documenting as opposed to perhaps providing hackers
with neon lights leading to critical business functions worth hacking.
so - do you name your servers ( or routers, for that matter ) things like
"accounting" and "payroll" and "intellectual_property" or do you name them
Frodo, Cirdan, Aragorn, and Saruman?
Chuck
one IOS to forward them all
one IOS to find them
one IOS to summarize them all
and in the routing tables bind them
-JRR Chambers-
December 19th, so they say.
www.lordoftherings.net
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
David C Prall
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 7:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cute IPX addresses needed [7:20758]
BA5EBA11 is the one that Novell almost always uses as a bad example of how
to name your networks.
David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Diliberto"
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: Cute IPX addresses needed [7:20758]
> How about DEADBEEF and BEEFFEED?
>
> >>> "Dennis Laganiere" 09/22/01 01:00AM >>>
> I'm writing about IPX and need some cute hex-word IPX network names, like
> DEADBED, or FEEDDEE...
>
> I'm stumped, anybody got any they like to use?
>
> --- Dennis
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20808&t=20758
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
