RE: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]

[Murphy, Brian J SITI-ISET-31]

I assumes he means driver support...

This is the list from linux 2.4.10

 [*] Wireless LAN (non-hamradio)                                   x x
     STRIP (Metricom starmode radio IP) (NEW)                    x x
     AT&T WaveLAN & DEC RoamAbout DS support (NEW)               x x
     Aironet Arlan 655 & IC2200 DS support (NEW)                 x x
     Aironet 4500/4800 series adapters (NEW)                     x x
     Cisco/Aironet 34X/35X/4500/4800 ISA and PCI cards (NEW)    

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]

It works via IP addresses...so yes.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steiven Poh-(Jaring MailBox)" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]


> Is both work with Linux OS?
>
> Steiven
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "netman"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]
>
>
> > I don't know about the Lucent stuff, but I installed some Cisco Aironet
> 340
> > series equipment last summer (99), and I have not had one trouble call
at
> > all. These are used constantly for classes and haven't had one probem.
In
> > fact I almost forgot we had them installed. You can't beat that :-)
> >
> > Donman
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steiven Poh-(Jaring MailBox)"
> > To:
> > Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:25 PM
> > Subject: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]
> >
> >
> > > Hello Folks,
> > >
> > > Any one got idea about above comparison?
> > >
> > >
> > > Rgds,
> > > Steiven




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21010&t=20954
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]