Thanks Charles, Should I just turn off synchronization on my site only? Or ISP site the BGP peer also need to turn off?
Daniel ""Charles Manafa"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Try turning off synchronization - "no sync" in the router bgp config. > > CM > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel Ma" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 5:02 AM > Subject: BGP route [7:21989] > > > > One of my customer uses Ethernet0/0, instead of Loopback as update > > source. (See following sample configuration) > > > > interface Ethernet0/0 > > ip address 200.110.60.1 255.255.255.0 > > > > router bgp 12345 > > bgp log-neighbor-changes > > network 200.110.60.0 > > neighbor 144.200.200.239 remote-as 1234 > > neighbor 144.200.200.239 ebgp-multihop 2 > > neighbor 144.200.200.239 update-source Ethernet0/0 > > > > ip route 144.200.200.239 255.255.255.255 Serial1/0 > > > > However, ISP thought it's loopback address, so in their configuration, > > they has a static route: > > > > ip route 200.110.60.1 255.255.255.255 Serial 4/1 > > > > However, internet users could ping to the router, but could not access > > servers which in the same subnet of Ethernet 0/0. For example, > > 200.110.60.2 > > > > Apparently, the network 200.110.60.0 was not advertised by BGP. Could > > anyone tell me why, and give some suggestion? Temporally, we asked ISP > > change the static route to: > > ip route 200.110.60.0 255.255.255.0 Serial 4/1 > > > > It's working now. But BGP should be able to advertise the route, am I > > right? So what's the problem here? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Daniel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=22028&t=21989 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
