The static is correct The "nat (inside)..." command is used to define a range of addresses that are able to use the global address pool.
What is the problem??? Andrew -----Original Message----- From: John Zei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 15:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX 515 nat or static [7:23286] I am currently using the static command in order to allow our static internal ips to have static external ips. From what you say I should be using the nat command in place of the static. I do have a nat command in place. For example my nat statement would read "nat (inside) 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 0 0" and a sample static statement would read "static (inside,outside) 64.23.67.5 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0" What am I doing here and what am I doing wrong? Thanks, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23356&t=23286 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
