Anybody who's had to use Avaya's IP products knows that Cisco has
nothing to worry about.

-----Original Message-----
From: ""Steiven Poh-(Linear Online MailBox)""
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco to buy Nortel??? [7:22909]


Cisco does not strong with PBX enviroment....they want compete with
Avaya....! That's why...


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Hanley" 
> To: 
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:14 PM
> Subject: RE: Cisco to buy Nortel??? [7:22909]
>
>
> > Amazing...I don't mean to be haughty or insulting
> > (really) but all of this seems so clueless:
> >
> > Why the concept of Cisco buying Nortel is so
> > laughable. They might be able to pull it off
> > financially right now, but it would be like Hyundai
> > buying GM. The problem is that even though Cisco is a
> > huge player in the Enterprise and service provider
> > space, in the RBOC, ILEC space they are out of their
> > element, and are even hated, much less distrusted due
> > to their efforts to bully the standards organizations,
> > etc... in the carrier space.
> >
> > I personally think that the view of cisco is always
> > skewed by those who see them from the view of the
> > enterprise, which is small potatoes from the
> > standpoint of a carrier vendor. Maybe the real message
> > here is that the distinctions between those two
> > markets are disappearing, or at least their interests
> > are merging (can anyone say OE).
> >
> > I don't mean to "dis" anyone on this list, but I think
> > the game is changing, perhaps in ways we all don't
> > understand, but at least the Nortel's of the world are
> > trying. To say Cisco will buy Nortel is like saying
> > McDonalds will start seving steak.
> >
> >
> > --- Chuck Larrieu  wrote:
> > > I'm just wondering what Nortel has that Cisco really
> > > wants. High end optical
> > > maybe, but as I said, Cisco already has Cerent, plus
> > > a stake in Ciena.
> > >
> > > Other than that, does Cisco want the PBX business?
> > > The switch business? the
> > > router business? the secure access device (
> > > Conntivity ) business? the
> > > Content server / switch business?
> > >
> > > In each case, Cisco either has a product line of
> > > it's own, or a strategy to
> > > bypass the particular  technology ( AVVID vs PBX )
> > > there is no point in
> > > buying more. In fact, it can be argued that this was
> > > one of Nortel's
> > > mistakes - trying to assimilate too many disparate
> > > technologies
> > >
> > > Besides, I was responding to the headline "Cisco to
> > > buy Nortel" And that
> > > makes no business sense at all. :->
> > >
> > > Chuck
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > > Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 12:49 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: Cisco to buy Nortel??? [7:22909]
> > >
> > >
> > > At 01:10 PM 10/14/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
> > > >If Cisco were to buy Nortel, they would be buying:
> > > >
> > > >1) all assets - meaning product lines, customer
> > > base, etc
> > >
> > > Why do you say that? Nortel is in the process of
> > > breaking itself up from
> > > what I have read.
> > >
> > > P.
> > >
> > >
> > > >2) all liabilities - meaning support
> > > >
> > > >Questions to ask:
> > > >
> > > >1) why would Cisco want to buy a PBX line of
> > > products when they have a
> > > >mission to eliminate PBX in favor of AVVID?
> > > >
> > > >2) why would Cisco want to take on a whole new line
> > > of routers and
> > > switches,
> > > >which they would have to support? Either that or
> > > EOL all of it? There's no
> > > >halfway here.
> > > >
> > > >3) Cisco might want to assume technologies like
> > > high end optical. But what
> > > >would that mean vis a vis their investments in
> > > Ciena and Cerent?
> > > >
> > > >4) why would Cisco want to assume another full
> > > product line that competes
> > > >directly with their CVPN line ( i.e. the Nortel
> > > Conntivity ) ?
> > > >
> > > >Sad to say, because I too think Nortel has some
> > > excellent products and
> > > >product lines. their VoIP solution is quite
> > > credible, coming form a company
> > > >that really is in the voice/PBX business. their
> > > Alteon and Conntivity line
> > > >rivals anything Cisco has to offer. their high end
> > > optical is certainly
> > > >worth looking at.
> > > >
> > > >but truth be told, Nortel is probably going to have
> > > to dump their router
> > > and
> > > >switch lines, just the way 3com did last year. 3com
> > > couldn't find a buyer.
> > > >Nortel probably won't either.
> > > >given all of the above, what's in it for Cisco? Too
> > > many liabilities, and
> > > >not enough assets, the way I see it.
> > > >
> > > >FWIW
> > > >
> > > >Chuck
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > >JG
> > > >Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 4:08 PM
> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Subject: Re: Cisco to buy Nortel??? [7:22909]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >I agree in not seeing much merit for Cisco (or
> > > anyone else in the business
> > > >already for that reason) in buying Nortel out.
> > > >
> > > >  Looking at the recent market cap for Nortel, and
> > > at the cash reserves
> > > that
> > > >Cisco is sporting the past decade, it wouldn't be
> > > an issue, not financially
> > > >at least, but strategicaly why would anyone bail
> > > Nortel out?
> > > >Who ever buys Nortel out, would be doing them a
> > > tremendous favor, but on
> > > the
> > > >other hand.... what about the agressor? What's
> > > his/her benefit?
> > > >
> > > >  Of course none has named me venture capitalist of
> > > the century, nor my
> > > >friends call me Warren [as in Buffet ;-)] but that
> > > is my honest estimate of
> > > >things.
> > > >
> > > >  Nortel looks as if is withering away on its own,
> > > why would one pay for
> > > it,
> > > >even if it's at a deep discount?
> > > >--
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  Rgrds'
> > > >  JG
> > > >
> > > >         ---==  Success, is where preparation,
> > > meets opportunity  ==---
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >""[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)""  wrote in
> > > >message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > There was an article in the local paper about
> > > the possibilty of
> > > > > Cisco buying Nortel.  Cisco says that they don't
> > > plan on making any
> > > > > major purchases right now, but apparently
> > > several analysts recommend it
> > > > > since it wouldn't be a major financial hard ship
> > > (although it would
> > > > > drain their reserves Cisco has enough cash to do
> > > it, and they have a
> > > > > much higher market capitalisation).
> > > > >
> > > > >      I'm ambivalent on the idea at the moment.
> > > On the one hand it
> > > > > would be a major coup for Cisco.  It eliminates
> > > a major competitor,
> > > > > gets them a big boost in optical as well as
> > > VOIP.  And, Nortel may get
> > > > > decent support (their web site really sucks both
> > > in terms of finding
> > > > > sales information and technical information; and
> > > when I was trying to
> > > > > get a manual for something they told me to call
> > > a reseller {most
> > > > > companies now have manuals on-line or will sell
> > > them to you, instead of
> > > > > making you pay for support}).  Cisco would also
> > > find themselves in the
> > > > > telecommunications business.  About 12 years ago
> > > when I worked for Bell
> > > > > Northern Research (the R&D arm of Nortel),
> > > Nortel was the world's
> > > > > largest supplier of telephone equipment (i.e.
> > > central offices, PBXes,
> > > > > etc.); although, I think AT&T/Lucent may have
> > > surpassed them in that
> > > > > department.  I don't know if Cisco wants to get
> > > into the traditional
> > > > > telephony industry; but, it could help their
> > > VOIP efforts.  And, if
> > > > > Cisco bought Nortel, that would bring Howard
> > > back in the fold.  :->
> > > > >
> > > > >      On the other hand; although there are
> > > companies nipping at Cisco's
> > > > > heals in certain niche markets, Nortel is their
> > > only serious competitor
> > > > > across the board.  I'm not sure Cisco buying
> > > Nortel would be a good
> > > > > thing for the industry.  We could end up with
> > > another M$ situation.
> > > > > Competition helps keep everybody on their toes
> > > and helps drive
> > > > > companies to improve their products and
> > > services.  This brings up the
> > >
> > === message truncated ===
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
> > http://personals.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23411&t=22909
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to