At 2:27 PM -0400 10/19/01, Mark Odette II wrote: >Ben, >I could be wrong, and you're using a new angle I've never seen before on >implementing NAT, >But I think your problem is this: > >You need to specify a NAT Pool, and the Access-List 152 is applied to that >pool, rather than what you're trying to do. > >This is what I mean. > >ip nat pool Name-of-Pool 216.162.122.Y 216.162.122.Z netmask 255.255.255.248 >ip nat inside source list 152 pool Name-of-Pool overload
I think the NAT config I'm using is valid; I've been using it (and variations on that theme) for while with no problem. The access list tells the router to NAT traffic from 192.168.10.0/24. Since I have only the one public IP, and it is assigned to the interface, there's no NAT pool to configure, so I configure NAT overload on the interface itself. While my public IP is part of that /29, I only get one IP out of that /29. Other customers of the ISP are using other IPs in that subnet. Ben Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23560&t=23535 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
