Look at the link speed in your bridge (was it BR340 or WGB340?). Main difference on 19xx and 29xx was the density, force your bridge to match the speed of the link rather than use auto. Make sense to me all the time. :)
Ryan -----Original Message----- From: Sites, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 2:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: aironet 340 question [7:23548] I've used these bridges quite a bit, and connected the ether ports of them into our Cat switches, nothing lower than a 2900. For the first time today I tried to connect one to a Cat1924. I believe the configuration is right on? The vlan, IP and Mask are correct but the switch will not see the bridge. Never had this problem before. Is there something about the 1900's that the Aironet doesn't like? Anyone have an idea as to what is causing this? Bob Sites System Engineer Valley Health System, IS Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23726&t=23548 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
