Keep in mind that EIGRP nor other protocols load balance per se but the switching mechanism is what's important.
Also a variance of 128 seems pretty weird, try something more reasonable like 2 Dave kwock99 wrote: > > I have tried some basic testing on the EIGRP load balancing. For simplicity, > I only set up 4 router in order to get equal cost load balancing. > > LANA******R1 ----------R2 ----------R4******** LANB > | | > --------------R3------------ > > ***: Ethernet > ----: Wan > > If I use the default setting for the bandwidth and delay, I can get two > route from LAN A to LANB. > > R1--R2--R4 > R1--R3--R4 > > After I changed all the bandwidth of serial interface of R1, R2, R4 to > 3000Kbit (default is 1544kbit), I cannot get two route to LAN B, only the > best route appears (R1--R2--R4). It is normal. > > I key in the "variance 128" command in R1 in order to get two route, but it > failed. The parameter 128 is make sure that the R1 will take any alternate > route to LAN B because the metric of R1--R3--R4 must be less than 128 * > (metric of R1--R2--R4). > > Anyone have the idea? Thanks. > > Francis -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23774&t=23623 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
