Yep, distribute-lists could work in conjuction with Jonathan's
suggestion of redistributing a static route.  I wanted to know how to
suppress the more-specific subnets and a distribute list would work.  It
would be pretty unwieldy for more than a few routes but it definitely
would work.

Are you thinking of a method that uses only distribute lists without
the static route?  If so, let me know what you're thinking, I'd love to
try it out.  I know that would work in cases where, like in EIGRP, a
classful supernet often resides in the routing table along with the
more-specific subnets.  A distribute list could be used to filter only
the subnets.

Thanks,
John

>>> Jim Dixon  10/22/01 9:10:00 AM >>>
Hi John,

What about Distribute lists? (in/out??)

-----Original Message-----
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 09:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771]


Okay, this doesn't quite qualify as a trick question but I'm having
trouble finding the answer.  I hope it's not too obvious or I'll be
embarrassed.  :-)   While working on one of the Fatkid's labs I see
the
following in the Hints sections:



3. There are two built in OSPF methods to summarize OSPF routes. One
way summaries between areas. The other summarizes between Autonomous
Systems.  Do you know a third way to summarize routes, which works for
any router, running any routing protocol?  How about a fourth?



I was quite aware of the first two but I have no idea what the last
two
could be.  I'm especially interested in the the method that works for
any router running any routing protocol.  I really have a feeling I'm
going to kick myself when someone tells me what that is.

Do any of you know what they're referring to?

Thanks,
John




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23778&t=23771
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to