Hi there, Did you ever get an answer, or figured this out ?
I can't quite get a clearer understanding of what they're talking about in the excerpt you submitted either. I was looking at the BGP case studies on cisco's web site and I still can't get it. Thanks ""Lupi, Guy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Below is an excerpt from a Cisco case study on multiple route reflectors > within a cluster: > > An important thing to note, is that peer-groups were not used in the above > configuration. If the clients inside a cluster do not have direct IBGP peers > among one another and they exchange updates through the RR, peer-goups > should not be used. If peer groups were to be configured, then a potential > withdrawal to the source of a route on the RR would be sent to all clients > inside the cluster and could cause problems. > > The router sub-command bgp client-to-client reflection is enabled by default > on the RR. If BGP client-to-client reflection were turned off on the RR and > redundant BGP peering was made between the clients, then using peer groups > would be alright. > > Does anyone know what they mean? I know in IOS versions 12.0 and lower there > were issues with route reflection using peer groups, but I am trying to > figure out what they are trying to say here. What do they mean by a > potential withdrawal to the source of a route on the RR? Any help would be > appreciated. > > Guy H. Lupi > NOC Engineer > Eureka GGN > 270 Madison Avenue, 5th Floor > NY, NY 10016 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23823&t=23765 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
