At 10:51 AM 10/31/01 +0000, McCallum, Robert wrote: >Dear all, >Before I take the leap into the lab (2 weeks to go now), I have a question >which has dogged me for a while now. Scenario below. >[snip] >1. On router 1 OSPF process is running Q: should I put lo0,e0/0, fast0/1 >and s0/1 as passive interface ??? This worries me quite a bit as the >argument of if you dont put the network command under ospf then ospf will >not run on that interface...BUT I have been told that you should ALWAYS >put every >"in use" interface into passive if it is not being used under the routing >process. > >2. This is not a question but a sanity check that for EIGRP and RIP then >the "norm" rules of passive interfaces apply.
For EIGRP (Pre 12.x where you can use the wildcard mask), you should passive out any interfaces you're not running EIGRP/IGRP/RIP. But in OSPF, you can specify which interfaces should run OSPF. So I would not passive them out. hsb Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24902&t=24902 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
