The non-designated port in the channel would still forward traffic.
""Brant Stevens"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I wouldn't create 2 etherchannels between the switches, as this creates a > loop, and with STP enabled, one of the channels would be disabled. Use all > 4 ports, or 2 of the ports; one from each supervisor engine. The commands > to accomplish this would be as follows: > > set port chan 1/1,2/1 on (2 port etherchannel, one from each supervisor > engine) > set port chan 1/1-2/2 on (4-port etherchannel) > > -Brant. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Washington Rico" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:28 AM > Subject: Gigabit Ethernet Channels. [7:26077] > > > > As always I appreciate your input on anything you cisco people can give > me. > > > > Question.. > > I am trying to create a Gigabit ethernet channel from two Cat 6500s. Cat > A > > Gigabit pors 1/1-2 and 2/1-2. Cat B Gigabit ports 1/1-2 and 2/1-2. Can I > > create a channel were Cat A ports 1/1,2/1 are on the same channel or am I > > forced to use contiguous ports as 1/1-2 as one channel group? > > > > Cat software 5.5.7 > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > $B$+$o$$$$(B & > $B;H$($k%V%i%&%6$G!"%$%s%?! http://explorer.msn.co.jp/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26148&t=26077 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
