I just took a quick look at RFC's 1583 and 1247. OSPFv2 does not support unequal-cost load balancing.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Cisco Breaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311] > > > As I said before I implemented equal load balancing on > Motorola and Cisco > what I want to know is, Is it possible to configure OSPF unequal load > balancing ? You are saying that OSPF unequal load balancing > can not be done > on cisco I know that. The reason why I asked the question is > cause I know > that cisco can not do but is it the OSPF behaviour not to > implement unequal > load balancing or is it belong to Cisco's OSPF implementation? > My guess is OSPF. > > Best regards, > > > ""Ralph Fudamak"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I don't know how Motorola implements OSPF, but with Cisco's > > implementation you can not do unequal cost load balancing > with OSPF. This > > is not to say that you can't manually change the metrics on > the links to > > appear to be equal cost. Keep in mind that this load > balancing is *equal* > > then. Your slow link will get as much traffic as your fast > one, which > could > > cause a bottleneck. See if there is some command to set a > default cost on > > the link, then set them both the same. > > > > Hope this helps > > > > ""Cisco Breaker"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I implemented OSPF load balancing but never done unequal > load balancing. > > My > > > customer wants Unequal loadbalancing on Motorola routers. > As I know > > Unequal > > > load balancing cant be implemented on Cisco without > policy-map? Any > > > suggestions or any info? > > > > > > Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27329&t=27311 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
