there are some points in Caslow that are not applicable to IOS 12.x and higher. this is one of them. everyone should be aware that Cisco has changed a number of things beginning with 12.x, some for the good, like this particular issue, and some not for the good, like the requirement that wildcard masks be contiguous.
So - for IOS 12.x, you can have both frame maps and inverse arp operating simultaneously. unless of course you invoke the no frame inverse-arp command on the interface. Which you may want to do. sometimes there is a phantom mapping of 0.0.0.0 to a dlci or two should have seen Val's face the first time he saw this in ECP1 class ;-> I seem to recall running into this issue recently..... Chuck -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Geoff Zinderdine Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Can frame-relay multipoint sub-interfaces support inverse [7:28367] > I was a bit confused after reading the Ciscopress CCNP Support book and > Caslow's ccie book. Can frame-relay multipoint sub-interfaces support > inverse arp DLCI mappings?? Ciscopress Support book seem to say no (not > directly though) but Caslow's book says yes. Thanks in advance... Yes. You can either use map statements or inarp, but not both. If you use a map statement for a DLCI, inarp will be disabled for it for that protocol. As the Caslow book says, EITHER use a frame-relay map statement(s) OR frame-relay interface-dlci xxxx, never both. Best regards, Geoff Zinderdine > > David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28373&t=28373 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
