On the page, it states... "Which Traffic Classes Can Use Excess Bandwidth?
Although the bandwidth guarantees provided by the bandwidth and priority commands have been described with words like "reserved" and "bandwidth to be set aside", neither command implements a true reservation. In other words, if a traffic class is not using its configured bandwidth, any unused bandwidth is shared among the other classes. " I have found that this isn't true. It does reserve bandwidth, at least with RSVP. If you create a policy that takes 360K of a 364K link, then try to set up a call using RSVP (and gave RSVP 24k or so) the call won't go through. Even though there was no other traffic going through, RSVP couldn't reserve any bandwidth because it was allocated to the other classes. So if someone says that it dosen't reserve bandwidth, they're wrong. ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We were discussing the difference between the bandwidth and priority > commands in LLQ a couple of weeks ago. I ran across this link last > night and thought it was interesting and helpful. > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/priorityvsbw.html > > Regards, > John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29503&t=29496 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
