Difference is, in Manchester, you still see plenty of modems around. Gaz
""Ole Drews Jensen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > This reminds me of a joke: > > How can you compare a modem with a virgin? > > When you're connected, they both make a high pitch noice. > > (sorry couldn't resist)... > > Ole > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 5:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: I Hate Modems [7:29545] > > > Dave, or anyone else for that matter, > > What image are you using for V92. We've had some problems with 12.2(2XA) > that stopped multilink ISDN users from connecting. > Can't find much info for V92 on cisco. > Anybody any news? > > > Thanks (and thanks for the info - into the saved folder), > > Gaz > > ""MADMAN"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Or more generally remote access!!!! > > > > Thought I would pass a tid bit of info I garned after beating my head > > and wasting time needlessly in the hopes someone else doesn't replicate > > same. > > > > Got a call from a customer, an ISP, wondering why his users with V.92 > > modems were always connecting at V.90. I quickly educated myself on > > Ciscos support for V.92 and verified the 5300's were up to spec. I > > found a V.92 modem laying, lying around and called it myself, the sh > > modem x/x showed V.90. I found on CCO a test number for V.92 calls and > > called this 5300 in San Jose, same result. I set up a 5300 in our lab > > with a PRI, same result. Read docs thinkng I was missing something, > > didn't seem to be, opened case with TAC. > > > > Talked to engineer, he didn't know why either. Got a DE and about a > > day later found out that even when you make a V.92 connection the 5300 > > will display V.90!!!!!!!! The answer was "you need to try a V.92 > > feature". The V.92 feature is modem on hold. > > > > I calmly suggested that they may want to take two minute and two lines > > of code and add V.92 as a connection type!! > > > > > > -- > > David Madland > > Sr. Network Engineer > > CCIE# 2016 > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29565&t=29545 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
