Hi everybody. The scenario is the following: I have two Cisco 7500 an several 2600 connected to one of them by E1s, the ISDNs of the 2600 are connected to the opposite 7500 and are configured as backup lines. The 7500s are connected between them by ATMs an EIGRP is the routing protocol. As you can guess, the 2600 belong to different branch offices. I tried to summarize in both 7500 with the command ip summary-address eigrp 1 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0, but I also had a static route with AD 200 to reach a DNS server in another part of the network, no managed by me, and as the summary-address command create default route, with AD 5, 10.0.0.0 ponting to Null0 in the 7500s, people in the branch offices couldn't reach the DNS server. Now, i'm thinking about using the same command but changing the AD, i.e: ip summary-address eigrp 1 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 230, but before doing anything i'd like to know yor opinions. Do you see any problems?routing loops, perhaps? I have been reading some post by MADMAN in the archives about summary address, but I think this a bit more complex, and interesting, scenario, and it's a real scenario! Thank you for your time, and sorry for my English, as you can see it isn't my first language. Happy new year for everybody!
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30528&t=30528 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
