you must be a remarkable individual to be able to take such pride in being such a negative person, such a sorry sniper, and such a whiny crybaby loser.
sooner or later you will be outed, and then perhaps we will be rid of you forever. Enjoy hiding as long as you can, chicken stuff. As they like to say on the Yahoo boards, PLONK!!!!!!!! ( list filter engaged ) Chuck ""Cisco Cisco"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Here is a little wit and wisdom. There isn't enough > RFCs or books in the world to help you pass the CCIE > lab. We will be waiting for your third "I failed the > CCIE lab AGAIN" e-mail. > > BTW... Your New Year's resolution should be to > consider minding your own business. > > > ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote: > > > Speaking only for myself, I look forward to your wit > and wisdom when > > providing us wannabees with the knowledge we so > desperately seek. > > > > While you're at it, can you provide us with a list > of the RFC's you have > > written? And the books? I'd like to check them out. > Anything to improve my > > own understanding of how things work. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Chuck > > > > > > ""Cisco Cisco"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Howard, > > > If you actually worked on a router in the real > world > > > rather than just tell people you do, you would > know > > > that Cisco has supported access-list remarks for > some > > > time now. > > > > > > Oh I'm sure you're going to reply to this e-mail > with > > > some stupid story like, "This reminds me when I > was > > > talking to a developer at Apple about Mac OS 1.0 > but I > > > had never really worked on an Apple" or some > worthless > > > story like that. > > > > > > Also do us all a favor and quit cross posting from > > > other mailing list. We don't want to see your > replies > > > to the juniper and ccie mailing list posts. Cross > > > posting can be dangerous when you're on some of > the > > > list the you are on.... wink, wink ;-) > > > > > > > > > ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote: > > > > > > > >Yes, it does make simple tasks a little more > > > complicated. However, using > > > > >inverse masking can make complex tasks much > easier. > > > > > > > > > >Take this issue. Say you are asked to filter > access > > > to all odd 192.168.x.0 > > > > >/24 routes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Your method. > > > > > > > > > >192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 > > > > >192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 > > > > >192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 > > > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > > > > > > > > > I see your approach, Marc, and I have even > > > encountered real-world > > > > situations where such filtering might be > > > appropriate. It happened > > > > when an enterprise wanted to "leave room for > > > expansion", but didn't > > > > understand summarization. They assigned > > > odd-numbered subnets to > > > > different sites/areas, thinking the even ones > would > > > be for future use. > > > > > > > > My approach, incidentally, is to figure out the > > > number of potential > > > > areas or sites, then divide by a power of 2, at > > > least 4, to be > > > > summarization-friendly. > > > > > > > > There's no question that your approach takes > fewer > > > lines of code. > > > > Personally, I wouldn't use it except in a huge > > > network where there > > > > was no other way to fit that many lines into > NVRAM. > > > > > > > > My motivation for not doing so is > maintainability. > > > The more complex > > > > the mask, the more difficult it will be for some > > > subsequent > > > > administrator to figure out what was being done. > I > > > might be more > > > > open to the idea if Cisco saved comments with > the > > > configuration, but, > > > > of course, it doesn't. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Send your FREE holiday greetings online! > > > http://greetings.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send your FREE holiday greetings online! > http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30608&t=30597 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
