I have always used floating statics to back up a frame relay network.
Why?
Easy - we're only just migrating to IOS 12.1. And anyway, this particular
network has been using floating static routes for the last several years
(since *long* before dialer watch was available) - they are flexible, suit
the network topology and design, and they work. And our support mob are
familiar with them, which is also a useful reason to keep using them.
I'd look more closely at dialer watch for a brand new network or major
redesign, but right now I personally have no good reasons for changing.
YMMV.
JMcL
"Charlie
Wehner" To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ISDN dialer watch VS floating
static
Sent by: routes
[7:31609]
nobody@groups
tudy.com
11/01/2002
12:49
pm
Please
respond
to
"Charlie
Wehner"
When configuring an ISDN backup for a frame relay circuit do most people
typically use "dialer watch" or "floating static routes". In my scenerio,
it's for an eigrp network and a single router.
I've seen the following article on Cisco's website:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/123/backup-main.html
However, all things being equal, which one would you use?
Thanks in advance,
Charlie
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31798&t=31609
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
