>OK, so I've been doing rack testing for some people who are going to be
>going public Real Soon Now.
>
>Got some things mocked up. Some of which relate to topics discussed on this
>forum yesterday and today. I need to check something and issue the command
>"show ip prot" enter.
>
>r2#sh ip prot
>% Ambiguous command:  "sh ip prot"
>r2#
>
>well, now...
>
>r2#show ip prot?
>protocol-discovery  protocols
>
>r2#show ip prot
>
>so what is "show ip protocol-discovery?
>
>r2#sh ip protocol-discovery ?
>   interface  Show for a specific interface
>   protocol   Show stats about a pariticula protocol
>   stats      Show Stats
>   top-n      Show Top-N protocols by bytes
>   |          Output modifiers


Top-N and modifiers are terms from the latest revision of RMON, so I 
wonder if Cisco is putting RMON into the general product line and 
just hasn't announced it. This wouldn't be the first time they've 
introduced the code before the documentation.


>
>
>OK. so a command I've been using since 11.2 is no longer valid. except that
>it is on other routers.
>
>but look - still good on other routers:
>
>r3#sh ip prot?
>protocols
>
>r3#sh ip prot
>
>
>OK, check CCO, no record of any such command as show ip protocol-discovery
>in any command reference I check. A search of CCO for the phrase reveals
>nothing.
>
>now what?
>
>the IOS version in question is:
>
>r2#sh ver
>Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
>IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3620-JS56I-M), Version 12.1(5)T10,  RELEASE
>SOFTWARE (f
>c2)
>
>sigh. have not run into this before, not in two trips through the lab, not
>on any number of routers and IOS versions, both at home and in customer
>installations.
>
>Anyone got any clue what show IP protocol-discovery does?
>
>sheesh.. another good shortcut down the tubes.
>
>Chuck




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31845&t=31817
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to