I created a line of routers R5---R1---R3-----R2 ( that's the way the test pod I was using is set up )
There are loopbacks on R5 and R2 that are addressed and will become the default networks R5 and R2 contain the statement ip default-network. R5 contained the 100.x.x.x/24 and the 199.1.1.x /24 nets R2 contained the 135.35.x.x/24 and the 155.55.x.x/16 nets. R3 was where the routing table outputs were taken. The default network was propagated properly and as expected only for those default nets that were also classful. Again, my point is that there appears to be an issue with flagging the major network when all you have are subnets. I did not try advertising EIGRP summaries from R5 or R2. That might work too. Chuck ""s vermill"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Chuck, > > Many thanks for taking the time. Could you clarify that you are issuing the > 'ip default-network x.x.x.x' command on one single router and all of the > others are flagging it accordingly? Or are you issuing 'ip route 0.0.0.0 > 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x' and then 'redistribute static'? > > By the way, you illustrate the classful/classless issue quite nicely. It is > my understanding that, where the 'ip default-network' command works, you can > issue it twice - once for the major network and once for the subnet. > > Murtaza, > > Thanks for the post. Both of the techniques in that text work quite > nicely. > > Regards, > > Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31864&t=31799 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
