Sure but I don't think I would go and redistribute them. You may want to consider setting up two HSRP groups. That way you could utilize both routers and have redundancy between the two default routers.
A better understanding of your topology would be insightful. Dave Scott wrote: > > Is it possible to have 2 different routers in the same EIGRP AS each have a > different default route? Essentially, a router will send a packet to the > closest default route until 1 of those routes goes down, and then all will > use the workng route? > > On Friday 11 January 2002 09:54 am, MADMAN wrote: > > You don't add the "network 0.0.0.0" to make it work otherwise your > > right on though adding the default-network command will work I prefer > > redistributing the static. > > > > Dave > > > > s vermill wrote: > > > EIGRP behaves a little differently than all of the other protocols. You > > > first have to define a static 'ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x' and then > > > add a 'network 0.0.0.0' to your EIGRP config. I think you have to > > > 'redistribute static' as well. It will not propogate a default as a > > > result of the 'default-network' command. > > > > > > Regards > > -- > Scott Meyer > CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, etc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32002&t=31592 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
