>Listers. > >I would like to make some routing changes to a mostly static routing >environment. Currently everything is either routed via default gateway, or >static route statements. > >the environment consists of about 30 remote point to point WAN sites, with >most data traffic consisting of IP. We have several sites on dual T1's, and >all sites are terminating at a central corporate location. So a big star >network. The vendor of choice is cisco for routing and switching. > >Anyone see OSPF, EIGRP, BGP, IGRP, ISIS as the way to go? I would like to >make this network more dynamic, just having a hard time justifying the move. > >All thoughts appreciated! > >thanks, >Jason
Without further information, I see no advantage to making this network more dynamic. If the issue is "static routes need more maintenance," I suggest that you tie the generation of static routes to your IP assignment process; it's usually not hard to automate. If it's already a star, what do you gain in flexibility by adding the complexity of dynamic routing? Failover and load balancing are, if anything, easier with static than dynamic routes. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32092&t=32067 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
