I haven't tried it but I would think it should work just fine. I had a problem once though on a 7200 where ISL wouldn't work, similiar to what your seeing. Tried dot1q and it worked fine. Try the inverse.
Dave Mike & Lynnette Keller wrote: > > Hello, > > I was attempting to use a 6509 with a 1750 in the router on a stick scenario > until my MFSC arrives. I have done this several times in the past with other > switches and have been successful but the 6509 will not allow me to route > between my two VLANs. The configuration on the 1750 was pretty simple and had > actually worked earlier in the week with a 3524. > The 6509 showed the dot1q trunk coming up but I can only ping the router > sub-interface that is in the same subnet as my SC0 interface. If I change my > SC0 interface IP to the other subnet I can ping the other sub-interface on > the > router. > > I had also heard that the 6500 unlike the CAT500 cannot use an external > router > to route between VLANs. Can anyone confirm or deny this? > > The routing traffic will not be heavy so I could let the routing go through > the 1750 attached to the 3524 but would like the router attached to the 6509 > if possible. I also have VG-200s on the network that I thought could perform > the routing, but they do not appear to let me set encapsulation on the FE > sub-interface. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance, > > Mike -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33240&t=33217 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
