Can you post the relevant configs then ?

""Cisco Nuts""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
> I have router RTA connected to router BBR running ospf 100. Router BBR has
a
> static route of 0.0.0.0 to router TS. Router BBR also has a redistribute
> static command under ospf.
>
> Router TS is connected to router Remote both running Rip. Static routes
are
> configured on TS for RTA's and BBR's networks. This is redistributed under
> Rip with a default metric of 2. Also, the router TS has a defult-network
> command to inject a default route to router Remote.
>
> On router Remote, I see the networks of routers RTA and BBR discovered via
> RIP
> R    4.0.0.0/8 [120/2] via 10.10.1.2, 00:00:18, Ethernet0
> R    5.0.0.0/8 [120/2] via 10.10.1.2, 00:00:18, Ethernet0
>
> I can ping these addresses successfully.
>
> But I cannot ping these same addresses from the TS. Why?? The packet from
> Remote goes thru TS to get to routers RTA and BBR. Then how come I cannot
> ping these same addresses from TS?? Also, I cannot ping any networks on
> Remote from RTA
>
> The solution I came up with was:
> 1.) Configure a default-information originate command on the router BBR
> which then injects a default route on RTA which allows me to ping networks
> on router Remote. This works!
>
> 2.) Configure on router BBR the serial network address between router BBR
> and TS under OSPF. This allows me to ping the networks of RTA from the TS.
> This works!
>
> So the question is more of a packet flow from router Remote from where
pings
> work to RTA and BBR but not from router TS.
>
> Can someone help me understand this?
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33540&t=33527
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to