Rock, If you have intf s0 to ISP1(desired) and intf s1 to ISP2, I would try "Set int s0 s1" after the match clause. If s0 is up-up, it uses ISP1, if it goes down then it uses s1 (ISP2). At least is should be so...
Constantin Tivig mcse,ccna blablabla -----Original Message----- From: BASSOLE Rock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 5:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Route map [7:33429] Hi group, I would like to define a route-map on a router to forward certain packets (defined by the ACL 101) to 2 different next-hop address. I use 2 next-hop addresses to avoid the single point of failure. The 2 next-hop addresses are directly attached to the router. The first next-hop address 10.10.10.10, the primary gateway, would be used to forward all packet maching ACL 101. If the primary went down then the second next-hop 11.11.11.11, the backup, would be used to forward all packets maching ACL 101. Would the following route-map do as I want? route-map test permit 10 match ip address 101 set ip next-hop 10.10.10.10 set ip next-hop 11.11.11.11 access-list 101 permit ip any host 10.10.12.12 Any information is welcome. Thank you all. Rock BASSOLE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33666&t=33429 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
