Some ISPs can be evil and ignore path stuffing for customers - happens
here in .au a lot. One way I've found around it that works very well is
BGP Conditional Advertisement.

Basically it can 'see' if a route is in the routing table, and if it
isn't, advertise more routes. So, if you stop seeing the default route
from your usual provider, you can advertise your netblocks (specified by
an ACL or a prefix-list) to a second provider.

Outgoing traffic could be left to the floating static, or use the same
method to advertise a default route to your customer routers/cores/whatever.

Reasons I like it: Works across multiple routers; works even if the
physical interface is up (floating statics wont, backup interfaces won't);
can be easily 'swung' by shutting down BGP sessions without shutting
physical interfaces; is a much cleaner solution than path stuffing
(SOMEBODY out there has a longer path than you do :)).

Take a look at:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/cond_adv.html

Rgds,




- I.

On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Joseph Brunner wrote:

> Sometimes As prepending won't work.. your best bet is to telnet
> to route-views.oregon-ix.net (public route server) and do a show ip bgp
with
> your
> as # (then you will know who is using your prepended path to get there.
Most
> likely
> one peer of your backup link providers, sets local pref or metric
> on a private peering arrangement, thereby nullifying your prepends.
> Unfortunately
> there is nothing you can do.. if you were a hi-cap T-3 or larger customer,
> they
> might traffic engineer this for you.
>
> Joseph Brunner
> ASN 21572
> MortgageIT MITLending
> New York, NY 10038
> (212) 651 - 7695 Voice
> (212) 651 - 7795 Fax
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alejandro Acosta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: BGP and one backup link [7:33433]
>
>
> Hi all,
>   I have a BGP question.
>   In this moment we have one Internet link with just one provider, now, we
> have got a second link  just for backup. I mean, we can only use it for 180
> hrs per month.
>   I can easily manage my outgoing traffic (using local preferece or
weight),
> however the incomming traffic in more difficult. I added many prepends (9)
> in the publication of the second link but there still few traffic on it.
>   There is not IBGP between my two providers.
>
>   Any ideas?
>
> Thks in advanced.
>
> Alejandro Acosta
--
Ian Henderson CCNA, CCNP
Network Engineer, iiNet Limited




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33677&t=33433
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to