You bring up a point I was going to bring up... I have a cat5k with a supervisor I (I believe)-- doesn't support dot1q. I was thinking of upgrading the supervisor engine to a version that does support dot1q, but was curious to known issues. Could you elaborate more about that problem you mentioned? (changing dot1q trunks to isl)
- Sean -----Original Message----- From: Mike Bernico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:54 PM To: 'Sean Knox' Subject: RE: How prevalent is ISL in the "real world"? [7:33759] We mostly use .1q, but i heard it is still better to use isl on old c5ks because even if they support .1q they still change it to isl on their backplane. mike ------------------- Mike Bernico [EMAIL PROTECTED] Illinois Century Network http://www.illinois.net (217) 557-6555 > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: How prevalent is ISL in the "real world"? [7:33759] > > > Is ISL still widely used? Are there still many shops out > there using it? (I > assume Cisco only outfits) It seems that Cisco has all but > dropped support > for it in favor of dot1q. > > Sean Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33770&t=33770 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
